Yet each man kills the thing he loves,
By each let this be heard,
Some do it with a bitter look,
Some with a flattering word,
The koward does it with a kiss,
The brave man with a sword!"
                     oscar wilde , the ballad of reading gaol







When was the last that I thought of you...I know not...but am I the one who goes alone on this path...and should I but care only a little for the souls that follow or those as march ahead?

Mode C is a way of life, perhaps my way of life: C for Cool, C for Cold, C for Chaos, C for Calvin. Ultimately, all of it boils down to the way you look at things. Are they not how they are but just how they appear?? No...and yes...Almost all the seriously critical fundamental concepts of life...aren't they just the bogies under Calvin's bed that he is afraid of? Miss Wormwood, Susie, Mom and Dad, and of course above all, Hobbes...aren't they all merely the means that he uses to attack these bogies?

Reflecting on 'living the Calvin way', I have started to believe that life and our reaction to it can only be explained by a number of Calvin and Hobbes strips combined together. The philosophy, as I like to call it, is to know that you are not alone. It is not just my perspective alone that is going to help me fight my bogies. I will be able to inch towards the Calvin way only when I perceive the other perspectives on my way.



   
<< August 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31



My Past
Loyola High School Patna
Delhi Public School RK Puram
Institute of Technology BHU
Infosys Technologies Ltd
IIM Kozhikode

My Present
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

My Future
My Life


Project Nanhi Kali for the girl child


Movie Reviews at Mode C

Kaminey
Gulaal
DevD
Guru
Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna
Omkara
Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire
Batman Begins
Viruddh
Anniyan
Dus
Sarkar
War of the Worlds
Mr. & Mrs. Smith
Bunty aur Babli
Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith
Kaal
Shabd
Raincoat
Swades
Musafir
Naach
Veer Zaara
Phir Milenge
Kyun! Ho Gaya Na
Mujhse Shaadi Karogi
Spider Man 2
Lakshya
Yuva
Main Hoon Na


Book Reviews at Mode C

Stay Hungry Stay Foolish
The Inscrutable Americans
Harry Potter - Half-Blood Prince
The Monk who sold his Ferrari
Angels and Demons
Life of Pi
The Da Vinci Code
The Tristan Betrayal


IIM Kozhikode Bloggers

Abhinav (Class of '05)
Aditya (Class of '06)
Alok (Class of '05)
Alok (Class of '09)
Ananya (Class of '08)
Andromeda (Class of '08)
Amit G (Class of '07)
Beena (Class of '08)
Chirantan (Class of '08)
DAR (Class of '07)
Deepak (Class of '05)
Dhananjay (Class of '05)
Divya (Class of '05)
Divyabhanu (Class of '07)
Firdaus (Class of '07)
Harsh (Class of '08)
Hemant (Class of '05)
Hitesh (Class of '08)
IIMK Photo Blog
Jayesh (Class of '08)
Kanav (Class of '06)
Karan (Class of '05)
Narayanan (Class of '07)
Manandeep (Class of '08)
Meren (Class of '06)
Nilanjan (Class of '06)
Paromita (Class of '07)
Pragna (Class of '03)
Pranay (Class of '06)
Prashant D (Class of '05)
Prashant JK (Class of '06)
Pratik (Class of '07)
Priya (Class of '06)
Rahul (Class of '08)
Ramesh (Class of '06)
Ridhi (Class of '07)
Ronald (Class of '05)
Saurabh (Class of '08)
Sheeba (Class of '07)
Shrikanth (Class of '08)
Sriram (Class of '07)
Suma (Class of '07)
Sumit (Class of '06)
Surabhi (Class of '06)
Surya (Class of '08)
Tity (Class of '05)
Vivek (Class of '09)
Yash (Class of '06)


Other B-school Bloggers


Chandoo (IIM Indore, Class of '06)
Nishith (IIM Lucknow, Class of '06)
Ravi (IIM Ahmedabad, Class of '06)
Shashank (IIM Calcutta, Class of '05)
Sidin (IIM Ahmedabad, Class of '05)


Blogger Friends and Contacts


Animesh
Gomathi
Keshav
Sankar


Interesting Reads


A walk in the clouds
Bollywood Blog
Global Trends Collaborative
Sepia Mutiny
The Movie Blog
Youth Curry



Contact Me




All pictures and names concerning Calvin and Hobbes are copyright Bill Watterson


11000
visitors: May 2004 to May 2005



visitors: since June 2005


Site search Web search


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed

blogdrive

Monday, August 01, 2005
Can you decipher this?

One of the courses this term that I have been really enjoying is Prof. Uday Damodaran's Portfolio Management. A change from the somewhat theatrical to a definitely more structured course being one important parameter that has grabbed our attention, there are several other reasons why there is almost full attendance in his classes, even if they are held at 7 in the morning.

Anyways, talking about the teaching methodology of Dr. Damodaran was not the purpose of writing this post. Ever since the last class, when we played the game that is popularly called St. Petersburg Paradox and subsequently analyzed it, I have been wondering if the explanation was so simple that even a lay person with absolutely no idea about finance or economics can understand the same. I will try to enumerate what took place in the class room and leave it for the readers of this blog to decide if they can decipher what I am talking about.

The game went like this: the class was divided into groups of six with one person in each group acting as the gaming house and the other five enacting the roles of players. There were five rounds in total with each round starting with closed bids by the players being submitted to the gaming house. The gaming house, based on the received bids, chose the player it wants to play with. Ideally, the player chosen should be the one with the highest bid but in case of ties, it depends on the gaming house's discretion. Irrespective of whether a player's bid has been accepted or not, he/she has to forfeit the amount that he/she has bid on the round to the gaming house.

Once the player is chosen, the game begins. The game involves tossing a coin till a head comes up. The number of times that the coin has to be tossed before the head turns up decides the payoff for the player who gets 2 raised to the power n where n is the number of tosses before a head appears. So the minimum that a player will get out of this game is 1 and the maximum can be infinity. Similar methodology is followed for the other four rounds.

Once the game was over, an average was taken of the amount that the players had bid for (including successful and unsuccessful bids) and for our class, it turned out to be nearly 7. Next up, Dr. Damodaran presented another game which is popularly known as the fair game. In this game, the player gives 1 Re. to play and a coin is tossed. If the coin turns head, the player gets Rs.2 and he/she gets 0 if it turns tail. When asked about how many of us would play this game, the majority said they will.

This, Dr. Damodaran said, disproved the basic assumption of finance and economics that we had been trying to understand for the past sessions of the course. The probability that head occurs is 0.5 and that of tail appearing is also 0.5. The expected payoff from the game, therefore, would be 0.5*2 + 0.5*0 (that is, a summation of probability of event multiplied by payoff from the event) which turns out to be 1. Thus, a person playing this game would be foregoing a certain 1 Re. for an uncertain 1 Re. (return from the game is only an expected payoff, remember but the money that the player puts into the game is a certain Re. 1). This is certainly not rational investor behavior but something that most people would claim to have when asked about it, primarily because of the positive connotations associated with risk-takers.

However, a similar payoff vs. investment analysis exercise carried out with the St. Petersburg game shows that the reality is quite different. Here, probability of getting head in the first toss (with payoff of 1) is 1/2. Head in the second toss has the probability (1/2) squared and the payoff is 2 raised to the power 1. For the head to appear in third toss, probability is (1/2) to the power 3 and the payoff is 2 to the power 2. Going on in similar fashion, we find that for each event (where event means the number of times that the coin has to be tossed before a head comes up), the product of probability and payoff is 1/2 in each case. Thus, expected payoff from the game would be a summation of 1/2 infinite times, which comes to infinity.

For an infinitely paying game, therefore, the average amount that our class bid was only Rs. 7. And we said we are risk lovers when asked about the fair game...just goes on to show how there is much more to behavioral finance than just asking the basic questions and trusting the investors' answers blindly. If put in a guise, the real picture does come up. There was a further follow up to this discussion, explaining matters in much greater detail but perhaps, I will save that for some other post to avoid an overdose and of course that post will come up given this one makes at least some sense.


Posted at 05:49 pm by Nitai

Prashant Kumar
August 2, 2005   05:56 AM PDT
 
ah, that was cool logic. UD seems in full form. njoi the class
Nitai
August 2, 2005   11:04 AM PDT
 
Yup Prashant, full form it is and enjoying I am :-)


Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments






Previous Entry Next Entry